Evidence Based Articles On Diabetes
Comments (0) 
If science is real why has no experiment met the odds of the Randi challenge?
Should we dismiss all of the scientific evidence that has been repeated by different scientist and laboratories (including evidence for psi) because none of them meet the standards of the Randi challenge?
Should findings on diabetes, heart conditions, mental illness, cancer, etc. be dismissed since they don’t meet the odds proposed by a magician with only a high school education? Should Randi be the final judge and jury on all scientific questions and experiments as the pseudo skeptics suggest? Is this what pseudo skeptics mean when they say they are giving answers based on science in this section?
Or are you comfortable with allowing people with doctoral degrees and published articles of their research in peer reviewed scientific journals continue to conduct and interpret scientific experiments according the standards of evidence within science.
Remember, Randi had a heart attack. Those of us in the natural medicine category that he loves to also bash laughed.
The mediocure minds always challenges those who wish to enter the unknown. And despite all the ridicule and psuedo science on their part, these experiements and research projects are still continuing.
Hey psiex, have you watched some Nassim Haramein videos? He’s a physicist (with no degree!) who was thrown out of a physics symposium 2 decades ago when he announced that there is a black hole at the center of our galaxy. Now that fact is common knowledge.
People who are ahead of their time have HISTORICALLY been ridiculed and persecuted.
What doctors should tell you about diet (part 1)
Themocracy